Testing is important, before you check in your work

On this page

• make
  • Typical issues:
• make check
  • yaml-tests
  • genererating of all stems - get list of missing lemmas: nouns, adjectives, verbs, propernouns
• Test only yaml-tests
• Test only generating of all stems
• Test if you have achieved what you were trying to achieve
• Scripts as a help to look at the generated forms
• Test the miniparadigms in the stem files

Testing is important, before you check in your work

The essence of testing: With testing, we want to check 3 things:

1. that the fst is not broken: (make)
2. that what we want to achieve is achieved: (analyse / generate the form(s) you want)
3. that our work has not made the FST worse: (yaml tests + check_lemmas.sh & ensure numbers are not worse)

make

With make you check that there are no technical issues. Read the report.

Typical issues:

• ERROR: Sublexicon is mentioned but not defined. (PYERRI)
  • there is a sublexicon PYERRI, probably in a stem-file, which is not in the affixfile.
    • a typo?
    • you are planning a new lexicon?
• ERROR: Sublexicon is mentioned but not defined. (muvgâ PUIGA)
  • there is an unbreakable whitespace between muvgâ and PUIGA
• ERROR: Compilation aborted because of 1 parse error. line 11634: syntax error at "suoraan"
  • look at line 11634 in src/fst/lexicon.lexc, but you must correct the error in the sourcefile!
• Segmentation fault: 11, Error 139
  • can be e.g. that there is in lexc the symbol > instead of %> . Look at what you have done yourself, or at the last svn-log-mail, if it is not your own work.

make check

With make check you also check the morphology:

yaml-tests

• These are static and test the same lemmas every time.
• yaml tests are good for testing changes in twolc and in the paradigms in lexc

genererating of all stems - get list of missing lemmas: nouns, adjectives, verbs, propernouns

• These are dynamic tests, and tests all the lemmas in the stem files, also the new lemmas you just added.
• Tests if it is possible to generate the lemmas as base form. This test does not test the inflection, but very often the testing still reveal if a lemma has got the wrong continuation lexicon.

Test only yaml-tests

Test only yaml-tests with this command:

sh test/yaml-check.sh

Test only generating of all stems

Test only genererating of nouns, adjectives, verbs, propernouns (no yaml-tests) with this command:

sh test/check_lemmas.sh

Test if you have achieved what you were trying to achieve

Analyse the forms:

usmn and usmnNorm

analyse e.g. nieidáin

If you don’t get any analysis, only ?, then you should generate the word:

dsmn and dsmnNorm

generate the forms, e.g. nieidâ+N+Sg+Com

Are you not quite sure that you you have a new analyser and generator? How to check the date/time for when you analyser/generator was compiled:

` ll src/`

Scripts as a help to look at the generated forms

When you are in langs/smn - the quick commands:

sh devtools/noun_minip.sh nieidâ

sh devtools/adj_minip.sh uánehâš

sh devtools/prop_minip.sh Aanaar

Get only the correct lemma and not compounds:

sh devtools/noun_minip.sh '^nieidâ[:+]' 

Look at all lemmas going to the same continuation lexicon:

sh devtools/noun_minip.sh PIIVTAS | less 

sh devtools/adj_minip.sh KOOIDAS | less 

Test the miniparadigms in the stem files

Look at all forms:

grep '¢' src/fst/stems/nouns.lexc | cut -d '¢' -f2 | cut -d '!' -f1 |preprocess |grep '[a-z]' |usmnNorm |less 

Get the forms which are not recognized by the analyser:

grep '¢' src/fst/stems/nouns.lexc | cut -d '¢' -f2 | cut -d '!' -f1 |preprocess |grep '[a-z]' |usmnNorm |grep '\?' | less 

Last updated: April 7, 2021 Edit on GitHub