Moksha NLP Grammar

Finite state and Constraint Grammar based analysers, proofing tools and other resources

View the project on GitHub giellalt/lang-mdf

Page Content

  • Tags for originating language
  • FLAGS USED WITH MODIFIERS WITHOUT NOUNS
  • FLAGS USED WITH COLLECTIVE NOUNS
  • Morphology

    INTRODUCTION TO MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSER OF THE Moksha LANGUAGE.

    The morphological analyses of wordforms of the Moksha language are presented in this system in terms of following symbols. (It is highly suggested to follow existing standards when adding new tags). +TYÄ Underdeveloped.

    The parts-of-speech tags are:

    The parts of speech are further split up into: Nouns:

    Interjections:

    Dialect tags

    The nominals are inflected in the following Case and Number

    The possession is marked as such:

    Particles

    Verb voice:

    Verb tenses are +Prs present and future ! nominal conjugation as well +Prt1 preterite I ! only finite verbal +Prt2 preterite II ! nominal conjugation as well

    Verb personal forms are:

    +ScSg1 subject conjugation first person singular +ScSg2 subject conjugation second person singular +ScSg3 subject conjugation third person singular +ScPl1 subject conjugation first person plural +ScPl2 subject conjugation second person plural +ScPl3 subject conjugation third person plural

    +OcSg1 objject conjugation first person singular +OcSg2 objject conjugation second person singular +OcSg3 objject conjugation third person singular +OcPl1 objject conjugation first person plural +OcPl2 objject conjugation second person plural +OcPl3 objject conjugation third person plural

    Other verb forms are +ConNeg connegative, main verb complement to Neg, vowel-stem +ConNegII connegative, main verb complement to Neg, cons-stem +Ger gerund This is used with Der/Озь and VAbl +Inf infinitive +Neg verb of negation эзь, аволь, иля +Aux auxiliary verb +Prc participle +VGen Verb Genitive, genitive form participle +VAbl Verb Ablative “озадо”

    +ABBR Abbreviation

    Special symbols are classified with:

    The verbs are syntactically split according to transitivity: +TV transitive verb +IV intransitive verb Special multiword units are analysed with: Non-dictionary words can be recognised with:

    Compounding

    Question and Focus particles:

    Tags distinguishing different versions of the same lemma (before POS)

    Semantics are classified with

    Derivations are classified under the morphophonetic form of the suffix, the source and target part-of-speech.

    Der begin

    DECLARING DEVERBAL DERIVATIONS OF VERBS

    +Der/Dimin diminutive markers in ня and кя seem to be subject of complementary distribution

    Tags for originating language

    The following tags are used to guide conversion to IPA: loan words and foreign names are usually pronounced (approximately) as in the originating (majority) language. Instead of trying to identify the correct pronunciation based on phonotactics (orthotactics actually), we tag all words that can’t be correctly transcribed using the SME transcriber with source language codes. Once tagged, it is possible to split the lexical transducer in smaller ones according to langu- age, and apply different IPA conversion to each of them. The principle of tagging is that we only tag to the extent needed, and following a priority:

    1. any untagged word is pronounced with SME orthographic conventions
    2. NNO and NOB have identical pronunciation, NNO is only used if different in spelling from NOB
    3. SWE has mostly the same pronunciation as NOB, and is only used if different in spelling from NOB
    4. Occasionally even SME (the default) may be tagged, to block other languages from being specified, mainly during semi-automatic language tagging sessions All in all, we want to get as much correctly transcribed to IPA with as little work as possible. On the other hand, if more words are tagged than strictly needed, this should pose no problem as long as the IPA conversion is correct - at least some words will get the same pronunciation whether read as SME or NOB/NNO/SWE.

    Morphophonology To represent phonologic variations in word forms we use the following symbols in the lexicon files: %{ИЫЙ%} phasing out Ы2, eg кундамс:кундай %{ЕОØ%} morphemes requiring a preceding vowel; also пинге %{ЕО%} сельме %{ЕØ%} кече %{АЯ%} А2 in кундамс:кундан %{ВИУ%} lative %{Х%} This usually precedes the plural marker %{КТ%} used in imperative and connegative %{ЬØ%} after imperative Sg2 %{DIM%} This will be for diminutive initial consonant

    2016-03-12 %^А2О used with final а in пула

    А2 А2:а А2:я %{вгк%} %{вгк%}:г %{вгк%}:в %{вгк%}:к %{гк%} clitic in %{гк%} %{АЕ%} К1 К1:к К1:т %{АЕØ%} ConNeg with ашень, тят, афоль %{АО%} пула stem %{АОØ%} офта stem %{АЕ%} prolative Х1 Х1:х Х1:0 Ь2 Ь2:ь Ь2:0 %{ъØ%} This will represent schwa in first syllable

    in ped realized as hard sign

    And following triggers to control variation

    Flag diacritics

    We have manually optimised the structure of our lexicon using following flag diacritics to restrict morhpological combinatorics - only allow compounds with verbs if the verb is further derived into a noun again: | @P.NeedNoun.ON@ | (Dis)allow compounds with verbs unless nominalised | @D.NeedNoun.ON@ | (Dis)allow compounds with verbs unless nominalised | @C.NeedNoun@ | (Dis)allow compounds with verbs unless nominalised

    For languages that allow compounding, the following flag diacritics are needed to control position-based compounding restrictions for nominals. Their use is handled automatically if combined with +CmpN/xxx tags. If not used, they will do no harm. | @P.CmpFrst.FALSE@ | Require that words tagged as such only appear first | @D.CmpPref.TRUE@ | Block such words from entering ENDLEX | @P.CmpPref.FALSE@ | Block these words from making further compounds | @D.CmpLast.TRUE@ | Block such words from entering R | @D.CmpNone.TRUE@ | Combines with the next tag to prohibit compounding | @U.CmpNone.FALSE@ | Combines with the prev tag to prohibit compounding | @P.CmpOnly.TRUE@ | Sets a flag to indicate that the word has passed R | @D.CmpOnly.FALSE@ | Disallow words coming directly from root.

    Use the following flag diacritics to control downcasing of derived proper nouns (e.g. Finnish Pariisi -> pariisilainen). See e.g. North Sámi for how to use these flags. There exists a ready-made regex that will do the actual down-casing given the proper use of these flags. | @U.Cap.Obl@ | Allowing downcasing of derived names: deatnulasj. | @U.Cap.Opt@ | Allowing downcasing of derived names: deatnulasj.

    @D.CONJ-MX.IND@ 2012-11-04 should this be D or N

    FLAGS USED WITH MODIFIERS WITHOUT NOUNS

    FLAGS USED WITH COLLECTIVE NOUNS

    number

    The word forms in Moksha language start from the lexeme roots of basic word classes, or optionally from prefixes: These have been slightly modified from kpv and myv


    This (part of) documentation was generated from src/fst/morphology/root.lexc